Validity and Reliability Analysis of Multiple Choice Item Evaluation Instrument for Measuring HOTS in The Context of General Chemistry Anis Syafitri(a*), Murniaty Simorangkir (a), Ajat Sudrajat (a)
a) Postgraduate Program, Medan State University
Jalan Willem Iskandar Pasar V, Medan 20221, Indonesia
*syafitrianis[at]gmail.com
Abstract
Providing valid and reliable items is necessary for the instrument evaluation tool. The instrument which is being used at school is lacked measuring students^ higher-order thinking skills (HOTS). This study examined the validity and reliability of developed multiple-choice item evaluation instruments for measuring HOTS. The instrument test consists of 45 multiple choice items and was developed based on the cognitive domain of Bloom^s Taxonomy. The method was conducted by using a quantitative method which consists of three phases: Content Validity by inter-rater agreement, Construct validity by principal component analysis (PCA), and Reliability shown by Chronbach Alpha. The content validity by inter-rater agreement found that the instrument was categorized as valid. The construct validity by PCA found that each item in the evaluation instrument measured one-dimensionality which good to be used as an evaluation instrument test. The reliability was established to be a high degree with Chronbach Alpha of 0,94. The multiple-choice item was found to be good for measuring HOTS by comparing the outcomes and skills of the students. From the result of this study, a valid and reliable multiple-choice item evaluation instrument has been produced and the items were properly proved to be good for measuring HOTS.
